TOP 5 Sustainability Marketing Mistakes: Steering Clear of Greenwashing

Navigating the Minefield of Sustainability Marketing and Avoiding Greenwashing

In pursuing a more eco-conscious organization, I previously elucidated the various archetypes companies typically fall under regarding sustainability. Understanding your company’s position in the sustainability spectrum is the starting point for effective and credible messaging. 

To reiterate, companies typically fall under one of three categories:

1. Sustainability in the DNA: Organizations founded with a core principle of sustainability.

2. Sustainability as a Business Feature: Companies incorporating sustainability into their mission and operations.

3. Traditional Companies: Organizations with no formal sustainability plans, even if they sell sustainability-related products like solar panels or energy-efficient homes.

The Tricky Terrain for Traditional Companies

The five most commonly encountered sustainability marketing pitfalls primarily plague companies in the third category. A survey of their marketing campaigns, official statements, and websites often reveals that they commit at least two of the following mistakes:

1. Overblown Rhetoric: The Risk of Greenwashing

“Greenwashing” describes instances where a company exaggerates its environmental commitments to appeal to eco-conscious consumers. Phrases like “saving the world,” “good for the planet,” “change the world,” or “revolutionary” are often thrown around liberally, creating an expectation gap. The reality often falls short of these grandiose claims, eroding consumer trust. “Greenwashing is a form of spin in which green PR or green marketing is deceptively used to promote the perception that an organization’s products, aims or policies are environmentally friendly,” warns the Guardian[^1^].

2. Opaque Operations: The Lack of Transparency

A closed-door policy on sustainability initiatives or weaknesses can raise red flags. Not looking upstream to assess the environmental footprint of the supply chain is a significant lapse. Transparency is critical for credibility, and as stated by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), “Transparency is the foundation of sustainability reporting, and how organizations account for their impacts and are held accountable”[^2^].

3. Missing the Report Card: Lack of Sustainability Reporting

Sustainability reporting isn’t just a nice-to-have feature; it’s increasingly becoming necessary for investor and stakeholder relations. This provides a structured way to measure and communicate sustainability performance and impacts, holding companies accountable for their claims.

4. Lost in Translation: Misuse of Sustainability Jargon

Wrongful use of sustainability terminology or graphics can quickly mislead consumers, who are becoming increasingly savvy about environmental issues. Knowing the lingo is crucial, as is avoiding outdated or harmful terminology that can alienate educated stakeholders.

5. Corporate Myopia: Absence of Stakeholder Alignment

Focusing solely on self-praise and company awards without aligning with stakeholders such as NGOs, creates a one-sided narrative that overlooks community engagement. As Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer noted in the Harvard Business Review, “The principle of shared value… involves creating economic value in a way that also creates value for society”[^3^].

The Safest Path Forward for Traditional Companies

To avoid these pitfalls, traditional companies should be candid about where they stand and avoid green language unless backed by action. This approach leans on the fundamentals of good marketing, prioritizing honesty and transparency. Sometimes the most effective sustainability narrative for a traditional company is the absence of one, lest they tread into the dangerous territories outlined above. This ensures the preservation of brand integrity and keeps the company clear from attracting negative PR.

While sustainability marketing offers a powerful channel to engage with consumers, mishandling it can significantly damage a brand’s reputation. Companies, particularly those in the third category, should exercise caution and adhere to best practices to maintain credibility in the market.

References

“’Greenwash’: corporate snake oil or climate solution?”](https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/aug/20/greenwash-environmentalism-lies-companies), The Guardian, 2016.

“Transparency as the Foundation of Sustainability Reporting”(https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/our-story/), Global Reporting Initiative.

[“Creating Shared Value ](https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value), Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer, Harvard Business Review, 2011.

Listen to the Corporate Sustainability podcast hosted by Philip Beere

Subscription Form (#5)

More episodes

Would you like to get in touch?

Contact us today!